Red-Winged Black Bird (Female) |
ALBANY OFFICE OF LMWF (LIPPES MATHIAS WEXLER FRIEDMAN LLP)
https://paladium.nfshost.com
Red-Winged Black Bird (Female) |
- List of litigation clients A-I 2022aug29
- Amarte: Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.
- Anonymous: anonymous clients represented in cases in JCP (New York State JUCTICE CENTER for the PROTECTION of People with Special Needs)
JCP is part of the state government.
- Ashby: KEVIN ASHBY
- Blais: RICHARD R. BLAIS
- Cerrone: THOMAS C. CERRONE
- Cowen: TIMOTHY COWEN and NYSCOPBA
- Decker: DAVID J. DECKER
- Hannigan: CHARLES HANNIGAN
- Hanse and other members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Coxsackie
- STEPHEN HANSE
- KENNETH MANNION
- JOHN OLIVER
- Hansen: RONALD HANSEN
- HEBREW: Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale
- Ichabod: Ichabod Crane Registered Nurses Association
- Names of A-I clients and brief descriptions of their cases
- Amarte: Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. 2024may10 federal, trial court Southern District of New Yorl Scott Edward Thompson Lippes Mathias, LLP two, federal, trial court cases which began and ended in 2024:
In the two cases above, Thompson represented Amarte. The cases settled. Tony V. Pezzano on behalf of Amarte USA Holdings, Inc...(Pezzano, Tony) We think that at least one conference or hearing of these case may have been at: Thurgood Marshall Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 USA.
- Amarte v. Geande Cosmetics Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Grande Cosmetics, LLC et al New York Southern District Judge Margaret M Garnett Case #: 1:24-cv-01240 20 Feb 2024 — Plaintiff: Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. Defendant: Grande Cosmetics, LLC, Macy's, Inc. and Saloncentric Inc. Case Number: 1:2024cv01240 840 Property Rights - Trademark Cause 15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
- Amarte USA v. L'Oreal USA Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. et al U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon 1:24-cv-01276 Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. et al. Retail & Consumer pacermonitor.com 20 Feb 2024 Lippes Mathias, LLP Scott Edward Thompson
- Anonymous: anonymous clients represented in cases in JCP (New York State JUSTICE CENTER for the PROTECTION of People with Special Needs)
- Introduction 2022mar14 Lippes Mathias firm represented clients in cases handled by JCP. The JCP web site provides PDF files each of which pertains to one case. The PDF files expurgate much information (for example, the names of the government employees, where the events happened, and the case numbers). In the PDFs, the expurgated text is shown by a black region. Below, we use "XXX" where the PDF file has a black region. Because of extensive expurgation, we (this web site) don't know well the facts which led to these cases. Each PDF file has a short name.
- Coligan: Lippes attorney Sarah Michelle Colligan We know of one JCP case. Name of case's PDF file: 2017-057.pdf government attorney Robert DeCataldo, Esq. New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 161 Delaware Avenue Delmar, New York 12054-1310 ALJ hears and recommends. Then, there is a decision. hearing 6 March 2017 JCP hearing at 9 Bond Street – 3rd Floor Brooklyn, New York 11201 (We guess that the accused employee lives or works in or near Brooklyn.) Keely D. Parr, ALJ recommended a decision. David Molik then decided on 20 March 2017. Decision: The request of XXX is granted. The Subject (the accused employee, the Lippes client) has not been shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed physical abuse. The Lippes client won.
- Hannigan: Lippes attorney Emily Grace Hannigan
- 2017 case 2017-055.pdf
- Intro We don't know the case number. Perhaps it is Justice Center case number 2017-055. The case is described in a PDF file which JCP seems to call 2017-055.pdf. Click the picture below to read that file.
- Events before and during the 2017 case Events in 2017 ALJ Nasci recommended on 10 March. Director Malik decided on 20 March. prosecutor Thomas Parisi, Esq. New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 161 Delaware Avenue Delmar, New York 12054-1310 There may have been a hearing at: New York State Office Building 44 Hawley Street, Room 1701 Binghamton, New York 13901. There seem to have been three defendants, all employees of NYS OPWDD. New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities The defendants are called "subjects." They were accused of category 2 neglect which supposedly caused brain injury to a woman in a wheelchair. Hannigan represented at least one one of the defendants. There may have been another defense lawyer. Elizabeth A. Sopinski, Esq. Levene Gouldin & Thompson, LLP P.O. Box F-1706 Binghamton, New York 13902 Binghamton is where the ALJ hearing seems to have been and where the Levene law firm seems to be. Sopinski may have represented at least one of the defendants. Was any defendant represented by both Sopinski and Hannigan? We guess that both attorneys represented all defendants. Who paid the Levene law firm? We guess that the Lippes firm paid. We think that none of the defendants were at the hearing handled by the ALJ. In the PDF file, Sopinski's name is higher than Hannigan's name. Why? Is that a coincidence? Was Hannigan at the hearing handled by the ALJ? It is difficult to understand the report because many facts seem to be blacked out, some crucial facts are not stated, and some, crucial facts are stated ambiguously.
- Outcome ofn2017 case All defendants won.
- 2019 Hannigan case, PDF file 2019-003.pdf 2023sep17 our main source PDF file 2019-003.pdf Todd M. Sardella, Esq. for Justice Center Emily Hannigan, Esq. for defendant "Subject" The hearing was in Poughkeepsie 12601. Brian T. Hughes, Administrative Hearings Unit, recommended a decision on December 18, 2018. Elizabeth M. Devane, ALJ, adopted his recommendation on January 4, 2019. . There were two allegations against the defendant. He won on the first but lost on the second.
- Schaefer: Lippes attorney Lawrence Henry Schaefer
- 2016-153.pdf The hearing seems to have been in Rochester: New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 2165 Brighton Henrietta Town Line Road Rochester, New York 14623 Perhaps the accused employee ("Subject" of the case, client of Lippes) works or lives in or near Rochester. Nasci recommended a decision. Then Molik decided. Nasci recommended on 21 November 2016 in Schenectady, New York John T. Nasci, ALJ decision by David Molik Director of the Administrative Hearings Unit 29 November 2016 Schenectady, New York Decision The request of XXX, as it pertains to Allegation 2, is granted. The Subject has not been shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed neglect. The request of XXX, as it pertains to Allegation 3, is denied. The Subject has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed abuse (deliberate inappropriate use of restraints). The substantiated report is properly categorized, as a Category 3 act. Perhaps a poorly behaving female, 70 years old, living in a mental health treatment hospital, was deliberately, wrongly restrained by a registered nurse.. It seems to us (this web site) that the Schaefer client ("Subject," employee) won on an accusation of negligent misconduct ("granted") but lost on an accusation of deliberate misconduct ("denied").
- 2017-129.pdf
2023sep14
- The case our main source 2017-129.pdf Lippes Mathias attorney Lawrence H. Schaefer, Esq. JCP attorney Kristin Kopach, Esq. New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 161 Delaware Avenue Delmar, New York 12054-1310 hearing at New York State Office Building 207 Genesee Street, Room 103D Utica, New York 13501 recommendation by John T. Nasci, ALJ 21 June 2017 Schenectady, New York decided by David Molik 27 June 2017 Schenectady, New York Accusation The Subject allegedly committed abuse (deliberate inappropriate use of restraints) when he conducted an unwarranted restraint with excessive force and improper technique, which included deflecting and/or pushing a service recipient’s wheelchair onto him and causing him to fall to the floor. CASE OUTCOME The client won.
- Background according to the PDF file The events occurred in a psychiatric treatment hospital that provides psychiatric treatment for inmates who are incarcerated in New York State correctional facilities. The hospital is operated by the New York State Office of Mental Health (OMH). The Subject was employed by the XXX as a Secure Hospital Treatment Assistant (SHTA). The Service Recipient was an adult male approximately sixty years old.
- 2018-160.pdf Lawrence H. Schaefer, Esq. for defendant government attorney Thomas Parisi, Esq. New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 161 Delaware Avenue Dehnar, New York 12054-1310 First, there is a hearing, then a recommendation, then a decision. hearing at Administrative Hearings Unit New York State Justice Center for the Protection of People with Special Needs 40I State Street Schenectady, NY 12305 decision to adopt recommendation 6 December 2018 recommendation John T. Nasci, ALJ 27 November 2018 Schenectady, New York _______ The recommendation was:
_______ decision by Elizabeth M. Devane 6 December 2018 The recommendation is adopted. CASE OUTCONE The client lost on allegation 1 but won on allegation 2.
- Allegation 1 The request of XXX, about Allegation 1, is denied. The Subject has been shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed abuse (deliberate inappropriate use of restraints) and neglect. The substantiated report is properly categorized, as a Category 2 act.
- Allegation 2 The request of XXX, about allegation 2, is granted. The Subject has not been shown by a preponderance of the evidence to have committed abuse (obstruction of reports of reportable incident).
- case 2019-010.pdf our main source 2019-010.pdf Todd Sardella, Esq. for Justice Center Lawrence H. Schaefer, Esq. for both defendants Both defendants were accused of misconduct regarding a service recipient. They lost on that accusation. One defendant was also accused of obstructing a later report. He won on that accusation. _______ The requests of - and - [both defendants], that the substantiated report dated - be amended and sealed, is denied. The request of [a defendant], that the substantiated report dated - insofar as it alleged abuse (obstruction of reports of reportable incidents) be amended and sealed, is granted. _______ John T. Nasci, ALJ, recommended on December 24, 2018, in Schenectady, New York. Elizabeth M. Devane, ALJ, of the Administrative Hearings Unit, adopted the recommendation on January 7, 2019, in Schenectady, New York.
- case 2020_076.pdf Schaefer 2023sep18
- General Our main source is a PDF file, 2020_076.pdf. To see the file, click the picture in the Comment section below. We got that file from a web site. justicecenter.ny.gov __________ JUSTICE CENTER FOR THE PROTECTION OF PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS In the Matter of the Appeal of XXX FINAL DETERMINATION AND ORDER Case #XXX: ORDERED: The attached and incorporated Recommended Decision is hereby adopted in its entirety. This decision is ordered by Elizabeth M. Devane, ALJ November 9, 2020 Schenectady, New York Elizabeth M. Devane, Esq. Administrative Hearings Daniel Sullivan, Esq. perhaps attorney for Justice Center anonymous employee Lawrence Schaefer, Esq. The employee lost. Sullivan seems to have defeated Schaefer. __________ The request of XXX that the report be amended and sealed, is denied. The Subject committed abuse (deliberate inappropriate use of restraints). The report is a Category 3 act. recommended by Elizabeth M. Devane, Administrative Hearings Unit. October 20, 2020 Schenectady, New York
- Our comment On 20 October 2020, Devane recommended. On 9 November 2020, Devane decided that the recommendation be adopted. The same person recommended and later decided that the recommendation be adopted. As far as we know, JCP usually has one person recommend and a different person decide whether the recommendation should be adopted. What is the value of the same person recommending and later deciding whether to adopt the recommendation?
Do we misunderstand how Justice Center handled the case? Is this PDF file a hoax?
- Ashby: Kevin Ashby
- Supreme Court Case Decided and Entered: April 11, 2013 In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellants, v GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS et al., Respondents. (And Another Related Proceeding.) 515409 515410 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Calendar Date: February 8, 2013 Sheehan, Greene, Golderman & Jacques, LLP, Albany (Erin N. Walsh of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondents. 515409 515410 Petitioner Kevin Ashby correction sergeant Department of Corrections and Community Supervision Butler Alcohol and Substance Abuse Correctional Treatment Center Town of Butler, Wayne County
- Walsh seems to have represented correction sergeant Kevin Ashby and NYSCOPBA.
- Blais: RICHARD R. BLAIS
- Court teacher's retirement Matter of Blais v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys. 2009 NY Slip Op 09102 [68 AD3d 1266] December 10, 2009 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010 In the Matter of Richard R. Blais, Respondent-Appellant, v New York State Teachers' Retirement System, Appellant-Respondent. Sheehan, Greene, Carraway, Golderman & Jacques, L.L.P., Albany (Thomas D. Latin of counsel) for respondent-appellant whether petitioner was employed as a teacher in the public school system from 1997 to 2003
- General Richard R Blais 18 Tekakwitha Ct [Crescent] Clifton Park, NY 12065 (518) 371-2549 Notice that Richard Blais seems to have had an address at 18 Tekakwitha. His attorney, Thomas Latin, seems to have had an address at number 21. (See our section of Ltin, above.) Why did Latin represent Blais? Did Blais choose Latin partly because Latin was a neighbor? birth date RICHARD R BLAIS 1947-02-23 Clifton Park NY RICHARD R BLAIS born 1947-02-23 lived in Saratoga Springs NY RICHARD R. BLAIS Project Lead The Way 747 Pierce Road Clifton Park, NY 12065 www.global2000.net/pltw
- Radaris Richard R Blais, 66 [in 2013, born ~1947] Clifton Park, NY Lived in: Clifton Park, NY Schaghticoke, NY Saratoga Springs, NY Saratoga Spgs (Spgs=Springs?), NY Related to: ... Experience Current: Vice President of State and Corporate Relations at Project Lead The Way, Inc. Project lead the way, inc. Position: Vice president of state and corporate relations Currently holds this position Industries Nonprofit organization management ... Addresses & Phones
- 18 Tekakwitha, Clifton Park, NY 12065 (518) 371-2549
- 17 Gloucester St, Clifton Park, NY 12065
- 240 Casey, Schaghticoke, NY 12154 (518) 753-6353 [Patricia Omara-Nordby (518) 753-6353 261 Austin Rd Johnsonville, NY 12094 Carrier: Landline from Verizon New York, Inc.]
- 36 Preakness Way, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 (518) 587-7137 [518-587-7137 BOBBETT, SUSAN 36 PREAKNESS WAY, SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866 Susan Bobbett]
- LocateFamily Schenectady 36 Sanders Avenue Richard Blais 518-381-8883 Schenectady 1928 Guilderland Avenue Richard Blais 518-952-7457
Classes: clients in class action cases
- Cerrone: THOMAS C. CERRONE 2023sep16
- Litigation
- Introduction We are not certain what happened. In this article about Cerrone, we state what we think happened. We might be wrong. There was a hit-and-run incident in 1993. Later, investigators suspected a cover-up. Cerrone was a cop for the NY State Police. As part of the investigation of the suspected cover-up of the 1993 incident, some of his fellow cops questioned him in 1995. As far as we know, he later complained that his colleagues, without probable cause, arrested him, then questioned him in a hotel for six hours. As far as we know, his colleagues said that there was no arrest, that he was free to leave and knew it, and that he voluntarily cooperated with them. He sued several cops in federal, trial court (NYND). As far as we know, that was the first court case. (Why was the first case in federal court, not state court? Was there a case in state court?) Later, some defendants appealed to a federal, appeal court (the Second Circuit's). Cerrone was the plaintiff in NYND and the appellee in appeal court. The appeal ccourt decided the appeal in April 2001. The legal dispute returned to the NYND case. NYND decided the case in September 2001. When the NYNDcase was finally decided in September 2001, only three of the original defendants were affected by that decision. In September 2001, the three, remaining defendants won. In 2008, Cerrone retired from the State Police as a sergeant. Attorney Lawrence H. Schaefer represented Cerrone when Schaefer worked for Hinman Straub firm. This was before Schaefer worked for Sheehan Greene firm. Who paid the Hinman firm for representing Cerrone? We think that a state police union paid. If a state police union paid, we guess that it was POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION NEW YORK STATE TROOPERS, INC.. We think that there were only two court cases: a trial court case and an appeal court case, both in federal courts. We are not certain that all of this Cerrone article is right. This entire series of events would make a good movie.
- Federal appeal appeal decided 10 April 2001 United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit short name of appeal case Thomas C. CERRONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott L. BROWN et al., Defendat-Appellants __________ appeal court docket # 00-7177 case reporter 246 F.3d 194 (2d Cir. 2001) __________ Attorneys in the appeal courtroom Lawrence H. Schaefer, then of Hinman Straub, was for Cerrone. Alan S. Kaufman, of Chamberlain Kaufman, was for the appellants. Why didn't the AG rerpresent the defendant-appellants? Was there a conflict of interest`
- federal, trial court case in NYND THOMAS C. CERRONE, Plaintiff, -against- Michael F. Cahill et al. Defendants United States District Court, ND New York No. 95-CV-241 (NDNY, decided 28 Sep 2001) We think that this is the case which generated the appeal, the case which resumed after the appeal. __________ McAvoy, D.J. Plaintiff Thomas Cerrone ("Cerrone"), a New York State Trooper, commenced the instant action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as well as state law claims for false arrest, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Cerrone's claims arise out of Defendants' investigation ... III. CONCLUSION Based upon the above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is in all respects GRANTED and all claims against Michael F. Cahill, Salvatore S. Valvo, and Richard G. Morse are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment for the defendants and to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. __________
- Result of all litigation 2023sep19 Cerrone did well in trial court before the appeal. After the appeal, when the dispute was back in trial court, Cerrone seeems to have lost.
- Employee, then pensioner 2023sep19 source seethroughny.net
- Employee Cerrone, Thomas New York State Police 2008 gross $93,871 New York State Police Sergeant-Statn Commdr [station commander?] annual rate of base pay $90,881 2008 __________ Cerrone, Thomas C New York State Police 2009 gross $10,099 New York State Police Sergeant-Statn Commdr annual rate of base pay $96,415 2009 __________ His 2009 gross was much lower than in 2008. He retired in 2008. Why did he gross anything in 2009?
- Pensioner Cerrone, Thomas C Division Of State Police $76,909 [for part of 2023?] NYS Police and Fire Retirement System Retirement Date 8/7/2008 Year 2023 Cerrone, Thomas C Division Of State Police $75,145 [for all 2010?] NYS Police and Fire Retirement System Retirement Date 8/7/2008 2010
- Home 2023sep19 19 Dose Roa Wappingers Falls, Dutchess County NY 12590 Thomas C Cerrone birth March 1955 Thomas Cerrone (845) 625-3599
- COWEN: Timothy Cowen 2022apr4
- Introduction to a court case involving a state government C.O. 2022mar23 NYS C.O. Timothy Cowen was injured. He worked at Mohawk Correctional Facility, in Rome, NY. His claim was arbitrated. He won in arbitration. There was a dispute in court about whether to confirm the arbitrator's award. In 2013, he won in court. DOCCS lost. Schaefer, of the Sheehan firm, won. Kerwin, of the NYS AG, lost. We (this web site) shortened and simplified the slip opinion below. ____________ source https://www.nycourts.gov Name of PDF file which describes this case 2013_32229.pdf
- Court Opinion and Decision in 2013 Matter of Cowen v State of NY Dept. of Corr. & Comm. Supervision 2013 NY Slip Op 32229(U) September 22, 2013 Sup Ct, Albany County Docket Number: 3524-13 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various state and local government websites. These include the New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service, and the Bronx County Clerk's office. STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT In the Matter of the Application of TIMOTHY COWEN and the NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Donn Rowe, President Petitioners, For a Judgment Pursuant to CPLR Article 75 Confirming an Arbitration Award, -against- STATE OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Anthony I. Annucci, Acting Commissioner; STATE OF NEW YORK GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS, STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF ALBANY Respondents. Supreme Court Albany County All Purpose Term, September 13,2013 Assigned to Justice Joseph C. Teresi APPEARANCES Sheehan Greene Carraway Goldman & Jacques, LLP Lawrence H. Schaefer, Esq. Attorneys for Petitioners 54 State Street, Suite 1001 Albany, New York 12207 Eric T. Schneiderman, Esq. Attorney General of the State of New York Attorneys for the Respondents (Adrienne J. Kerwin, Esq. AAG) The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 DECISION and ORDER INDEX NO. 3524-13 RJI NO. 01-13-110503 TERESI,J.: Mr. Cowen was injured in a work related accident while working for the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("DOCCS") as a Corrections Officer. Petitioners commenced this proceeding to confirm arbitrator Paul Zonderman's Opinion and Award, dated September 11,2012 ("Arbitrator" and "Arbitrator's Award"). Respondents oppose the petition, and cross petition to vacate the Arbitrator's Award claiming that the Arbitrator exceeded his powers. Because Petitioners are entitled to confirmation and Respondents failed to demonstrate that the Arbitrator exceed his powers, the petition is granted and the cross petition is denied. The cross petition is denied, the petition is granted, and the Arbitrator's Award is confirmed. So Ordered. Dated: Albany, New York September Z_2- ,2013 Joseph O'Teresi, J.S.C.
- NYS Payroll Info 2009 State Gov't January 2009 Payroll Database COWEN, TIM G; CORR OFFICER; 55,718.00; ANN; Rome; 16-Aug-93; 10390 Mohawk Correctional Facility The 20009 NYS payroll had "COWEN, TIM G." In 20013, the Sheehan firm represented Timothy Cowen. Perhaps they are the same person-
- NYC DoC C.O.
- General In 2013, the Sheehan firm represented a state government C.O. named Timothy Cowen. At that time, there was a city government C.O. named Timothy Cowen. Do not confuse them with each other. Below, we briefly describe the city C.O. Timothy Cowen Rikers Island is in New York City and Bronx County of New York State. There is a city jail there. Rikers Island jail supervisor the Bronx, NYC, NY January 2016 Timothy Cowen 33 in 2016 a captain working at the George R. Vierno Center at Rikers Island jail City Department of Correction personnel supervisor Rikers Island COWEN, 33 living in Islandia, N.Y. worked for NYC DoC since March 2007 annual base salary of about $81,879
- pay of city C.O. source seethroughny.net 2021 Cowen, Timothy N DoC gross $184,579 Captain base pay $114,617 2021 New York City 2008 Cowen, Timothy N DoC gross $42,903 DoC Correction Officer - Rotating Shifts -(Hired After 6/30/93) base pay $37,316 2008
- pistol permit Below, we mention a possible coincidence. A pistol permit was issued in NYS to someone named: COWEN,TIMOTHY G COWEN,TIMOTHY,G,,,NY. The permittee may be neither the state C.O. nor the city C.O.
- DECKER: DAVID J. DECKER 2024may12
- General Lippes's attorney Sleight seems to have represented David J. Decker in an appeal. AD3 (Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Dept., NY, USA) phone 518-471-4777 TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2023 1:00 P.M. AD3 Case No. 112140 Calendar number 1 PEOPLE v DAVID J. DECKER [a criminal case, we think] For Appellant Decker Karl J. Sleight, Esq. Lippes Mathias, LLP For Respondent, The People of the State of New York Benjamin R. Smith, Esq. Warren County District Attorney's Office [Is "The" the first word of the respondemt's namw?] A criminal, appeal case in state court
- Legal fees How much money was Lippes paid for its work in this case? How much was paid per hour for ippes's work? Do any Lippes clients pay more for Lippes's work in that court (AD3, Supreme Court in Albany Coubty)?
- Judges BENCH POSITION: FISHER, J., AARONS, J., EGAN, J.P. (presiding justice), CERESIA, J MCSHAN, J. Why were there only five judges? Were the others on vacation?
- NYSCOPBA and Decker Attorney Karl J. Sleight of Lippes's Albany office represented criminal appellant David J. Decker. As far as we know, the Lippes law firm (especially lawyers in Lippes's Albany office) then represented NYSCOPBA union. NYSCOPBA's full name is NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC. Notice that "CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND POLICE" is in the union's name. That union pays millions of dollars annually to Lippes for work by Lippes's Albany office. Lippes litigates, lobbies, and negotiates for its client, NYSCOPBA union. Lippes has represented NYSCOPBA in AD3 cases for many years. That union seems to be the biggest client of Lippes's Albany office, the same office which represented criinal appellant David J. Decker. Was criminal appellant Decker a DoCCS prisoner while Lippes represented him? Many C.O.s see thenselves as part of the an ti-crime part of the government. Many C.O.s identify with,, and want to become, police officers. Did a court appoint Lippes attorney Slright to represent Decker?
.
- nuwber.com about Decker 2024jul4 nuwber.com David J Decker from Philmont, NY + 1 Male PO Box 312 Philmont, NY, 12565 (518) 672-7169 Inferred Single Home Ownership Probable Home Owner Residence Since 2014 Associated with Devin J Decker (2020-2021) Previous address Philmont, NY, 12565 Period of residence 2016 David John Decker AGE 74 Burnt Hills, NY [We guess that it is a coincidence that Lippes attorney Anoush M Koroghlian, also known as Anoush K Scott, seems to have lived in Burnt Hills.] Also known as David John Decker
- mylife.com mylife.com 2024jul14 David Decker 74 Burnt Hills, NY, 12027 ?@nycap.rr.com ?@global.com phone atea code 518 $50-$59,999 Net Worth David J Decker Burnt Hills, NY - Has Court or Arrest Records Court Records. birthday 06/08/1950 Previously cities included Chatham NY and Philmont NY David J Decker are some of the alias or nicknames that David has used. For work these days, David is an Owner at Empire Allstars Basketball.
- Hannigan: Charles Hannigan
- Introduction Is this Hannigan client related to the Lippes attorney Enily Grace Hannigan? This case concerns Attica Correctional Facility.
- Court Case Charles Hannigan, DOCCS correction sergeant at Attica CF New York State Dept. of Corr. Servs. (New York State Corr. Officers & Police Benevolent Assn., Inc.) 2012 NY Slip Op 07242 Decided on November 1, 2012 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau Decided and Entered: November 1, 2012 514141 In the Matter of the Arbitration between NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES et al., Respondents, and NEW YORK STATE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS AND POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellants. Calendar Date: September 7, 2012 Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Egan Jr., JJ. Sheehan, Greene, Golderman & Jacques, LLP, Albany (Lawrence H. Schaefer of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. [Trada] Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Julie M. Sheridan of counsel), for respondents. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Egan Jr., J. Charles Hannigan, a correction sergeant then working at Attica Correctional Facility in Wyoming County, alleging that Hannigan failed to report the use of force upon an inmate, failed to have the inmate evaluated by the facility's medical staff and made false and/or misleading statements to his superiors regarding the incident.
- Possible, Recent Address NY zip code 14094 Lockport 40 Spruce Street Charles Hannigan 716-434-5195 ... The SCF (first three zip code digits) of the Lockport person is 140. The Sheehan correctional client worked in Attica CF. Attica CF has SCF 140. DOCCS Prisons Attica Correctional Facility 639 Exchange St Attica, New York 14011-0149 Wyoming County We guess that the Lockport person may be the Sheehan correctional client.
- Hanse and other members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Coxsackie
- STEPHEN HANSE
- KENNETH MANNION
- JOHN OLIVER,
- Greene County Supreme Court Case Bull v Hanse 2007 NY Slip Op 32762(U) September 6, 2007 Supreme Court, Greene County Docket Number: 0020078/7110 Judge: Joseph C. Teresi SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF GREENE STATE OF NEW YORK JOHN BULL, as Mayor of the Village of Coxsackie, Petitioner, against STEPHEN HANSE, KENNETH MANNION, and JOHN OLIVER, individually and as members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Coxsackie, Respondents. DECISION and ORDER INDEX NO.: 07-0871 R.II NO.: 19073079 ..... Supreme Court Albany County Special Term August 2, 2007 Assigned Justice Joseph C. Teresi Eugenia Brennan Heslin, Esq. Kaplan & Brennan, PLLC Attorneys for Petitioner PO Box 155 Hunter, NY 12442 Erin N. Walsh, Esq. Sheehan, Greene, Carraway, Golderman & Jacques, LLP Attorneys for Respondents 99 Pine Street, Suite 402 Albany, NY 12207
- Our Summary of the Court Decision TERESI, J.: Petitioner, John Bull, Mayor of the Village of Coxsackie, brings this Article 78 proceeding challenging the actions of Respondents, members of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Coxsackie. Respondents oppose the petition. This Court dismisses the petition as moot. Dated: September~ 2007 Albany, New York
- Result of Court Case
- Events A mayor represented by Eugenia Brennan Heslin, sued a few, government officers (village trustees). Walsh represented the sued, government officers. The government officers defeated the mayor.
- Parties The respondents defeated the petitioner.
- Attorneys Erin N. Walsh defeated Eugenia Brennan Heslin.
- Hansen: RONALD HANSEN
- Court a disciplined DOCCS C.O. State of New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 26, 2009 In the Matter of the Arbitration between RONALD HANSEN and Department of Correctional Services. 505428 Sheehan, Greene, Carraway, Golderman & Jacques, L.L.P., Albany (Edward J. Greene of counsel), for respondents. Petitioner Ronald Hansen was employed by respondent DOCS as a correction officer. In 2005, petitioner received two notices of discipline
- LocateFamily Greenwich P.O.Box 50 Ronald Hansen 518-692-7915
- HEBREW: Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale
2024may22
- Intriduction The client wanted to evict ("discharge") an RP (resident-patient). The RP appealed but lost in 2020. Here we describe the appeal. The appeal was decided by the state government: Bureau of Adjudication New York Department of Health. Our source: a PDF file the original name of which is "DA20_5433.pdf" In our web site, the PDF file has a different name.
- Litigants, attorneys, and ALJ The client was HHAR: Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale 5901 Palisade Avenue Riverdale, New York 10471. The client's attorney was James Armond Shannon, who later became a Lippes partner in Lippes's Almany office. James A. Shannon, Esq. Jackson Lewis P.C. 677 Broadway, 9th Floor Albany, New York 12207 The RP's attorney before the appeal may possibly have been New York Legal Assistance Group's attorney: Joshua B. Kiel, Esq. 7 Hanover Square, 18th Floor New York, New York 10004. . . We guess that perhaps Kiel did not represent the RP in the appeal. The Health Department did not mail to Kiel a copy of its Decision After Hearing, as far as we know. "On September 3, 2020, a hearing was held by videoconference before Dawn MacKillop-Soller, Administrative Law Judge." We guess that perhaps the RP-appellant was either:
- Rivkah Boorstein or
- Ms. Anne Weisbrod Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale 901 Palisade Avenue Riverdale, New York 10471 13.
- Result of appeal The nursing home defeated its RP (resident-patient). The respondent defeated the appellant. Jackson Lewis's attorney James Armond Shannon defeated the RP.
- ICHABOD: Ichabod Crane Registered Nurses Association a nurse union
- Introduction 2022jun3 Ichabod Crane Central School District is in Columbia County, NY. Lawrence Schaefer represented Ichabod nurse union when he worked for the Hinman Straub law firm. Later, he worked for the Sheehan firm. Now (May 2022), he works for the Lippes firm. The Sheehan and Lippes firms are intimately related to each other. Lawyers at the Sheehan firm gave money to the Hinman firm's PAC in various years. We briefly discuss the payments on the political payments page. Some information in this Ichabod section came from findlaw.com web site. There was an Ichabod court case in Supreme Court. The court decided it on 26 December 2002. A copy of the decision is in a PDF file. Our summary and comments are slightly below on this page.
- Supreme Court Case in 2002 90551 NEW YORK IN RE: CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York IN RE: CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., LOCAL 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, ICHABOD CRANE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CSEA UNIT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS BOARD, et al., Respondents. Decided: December 26, 2002 Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, PETERS, SPAIN and ROSE, JJ. Nancy E. Hoffman, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Albany (Miguel Ortiz of counsel), for petitioner Gary Johnson, Public Employment Relations Board, Albany, for Public Employment Relations Board and others, respondents Hinman Straub P.C., Albany (Lawrence H. Schaefer of counsel), for Ichabod Crane Registered Nurses Association, respondent. friends of the court
Rains & Pogrebin P.C., Mineola (Richard K. Zuckerman of counsel), for County of Suffolk, amicus curiae (This friend is on Long Island.) Colleran, O'Hara & Mills, Garden City (Stephanie Suarez of counsel), for New York State AFL-CIO, amicus curiae (This friend is on Long Island.) James R. Sandner, New York State United Teachers, Latham (Kevin H. Harren of counsel), for New York State United Teachers, amicus curiae. Harter, Secrest & Emery L.L.P., Rochester (Matthew D. Brown of counsel), for County Nursing Facilities of New York State, amicus curiae- Result of Court Case
- Events A non-teacher union, represented by Miguel Ortiz, sued the NYS government and a nurse union. Schaefer represented the nurse union. The state government defeated the non-teacher union..
- Parties A respondent defeated the petitioner.
- Attorneys PERB's Gary Johnson defeated Nancy E. Hoffman's Miguel Ortiz.
Clients: A-I Classes J-R S-Z Court cases
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 NY Pistol Permits | Impropriety in USA Gov't | Home Page | ||
| Main NY Page | Previous Page | Next Page | ||
